KADE

INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVES / WORKSHEET / 26 OCTOBER 2026

Can you show the working?

A practical companion for examining what survives the journey from analytical result to institutional review.

Download PDFReturn to KADE
Institution / team
Review date / reference
01

What was being asked?

Record the original question, intended use, portfolio context and analytical date.

Question / intended use / context / as-of date
02

What supported the result?

Identify sources, source dates, access permissions and the evidence needed to revisit the read.

Source / version / source date / permitted access / evidence link
03

How was it produced?

Keep the method, configuration, assumptions and version needed for an informed review.

Method / configuration / assumptions / version / limitations
04

Where did perspectives differ?

Make conflicts, limitations and unanswered questions visible alongside the conclusion.

Agreement / conflict / unknowns / next question
05

Who reviewed what happened next?

Record the responsible reviewer, challenge raised and institutional decision.

Reviewer / challenge / decision / date / follow-up